Technical Hiring Help for Startups
Technical hiring help for startups that do not yet have a senior engineer to judge one: we define the role, write the job description, screen portfolios and code, run the technical interviews, calibrate the level and plan the first 90 days. Your recruiter finds the people; we tell you which ones can do the job.
What technical hiring help for startups covers
The first engineering hire at a startup is usually made by someone who cannot do the job themselves: a founder with a product background, or a software lead who has never laid out a board, choosing between three candidates who all sound confident. Nobody on the team can tell whether the firmware engineer who talks fluently about RTOS design has ever brought up a board. That is the gap we fill: the technical side of hiring, done by engineers who do the work.
The scope is deliberately narrow. We define the role, write the job description, screen portfolios and code, run the technical interviews, calibrate the level, and plan the first 90 days. We are not a recruiter or a staffing agency: no placement fees, no candidate database, no guarantee that a particular person accepts. Your recruiter owns sourcing and the offer; we work alongside them and own the technical judgement.
Timing is why it matters. Our guide to hiring in-house versus working with an engineering firm puts the figure plainly: a senior hardware engineer in the Bay Area takes four to nine months to hire. What follows shortens that search and keeps the product moving while it runs.
Define the role honestly before you post it
Most first-hire job descriptions describe three people: schematic capture and multi-layer PCB layout, RTOS firmware with BLE and over-the-air updates, a mobile app, cloud telemetry and a little mechanical design. One person cannot be the PCB designer, the firmware lead and the app developer at a professional level. A posting that asks for it attracts juniors who do not know what they do not know, and tells good candidates that nobody technical wrote it.
So we start from the roadmap. What ships in the next two quarters, and which of it is daily work rather than a two-week burst for a specialist? From that we write a role one person can hold, usually a firmware engineer who can read a schematic and own bring-up, or a hardware engineer who can write test firmware. Everything else becomes a plan: a second hire later, or bounded engineering from a partner (see hardware for startups) until the team grows into it. Sometimes the honest answer is that it is not a hire yet.
The job description
The description names the stack honestly (MCU family, radio, build system, CAD tool), the stage of the hardware (dev kit, first custom board, EVT), the first three things the hire will deliver, who reviews their work, and what the role is not. Candidates self-select far better on that than on a list of twelve required skills.
How to hire a hardware engineer or an embedded firmware engineer
Both disciplines leave evidence; the hard part is knowing what to ask for and how to read it.
Screening portfolios and code
For a hardware engineer we ask for one board they designed end to end and talk through it: the schematic, the layout decisions, the power tree, what changed between revisions and what failed in testing. A candidate who owned the board answers in detail; one who was handed a finished design cannot. For an embedded firmware engineer we read code: a driver, a state machine, how errors and power states are handled, whether there are tests and a build that runs outside their own laptop.
The technical interview
The loop we design is the job, compressed: a schematic review in which the candidate finds what we planted and explains what they would change; a debugging session on a described failure (the board browns out when the radio transmits, say) to watch how they reason; and a design conversation about your actual product, under your candidate NDA. We write the questions, run the sessions or sit in on yours as the technical interviewer, and deliver a written assessment per candidate with evidence rather than a score.
A take-home that respects the candidate's time
A take-home is useful only when strong candidates finish it. We scope ours to two to four hours, choose a task that reflects the real work (a driver against a datasheet, a review of a short schematic), state the time budget in the brief, and review the submission with the candidate afterwards. Senior engineers decline weekend-sized assignments, and they are right to.
Calibrating the level and planning the first 90 days
We do not publish or quote salary numbers; your recruiter and your compensation data own that. What we calibrate is level, and the work decides it: a role that owns the architecture and reviews other people's designs is a lead or staff role whatever the title says, and offered at a mid-level band it produces no hire or the wrong one. We put in writing which level the role needs and how each finalist's evidence maps to it.
The 90-day plan is the part most startups skip. It names the first board or firmware release the hire owns, the design decisions already made and why, who reviews their work, and what good looks like at thirty, sixty and ninety days. If nobody on the team can review that work, the gap is leadership, not hiring: for someone to own the process and manage the engineer afterwards, closer to a fractional VP of engineering, see our fractional CTO engagement.
Bridging the gap with engineering until the hire lands
Four to nine months is a long time for a product to stand still. During the search we can carry the engineering, the board revision, the firmware bring-up or the app release, as a bounded project with its own written quote, so the hire inherits a working product: a documented design, a repository that builds, bring-up notes and a test plan. For the device software side, see firmware development.
The handover is planned from the start: the new engineer joins design reviews before their first day, the repository and documentation are theirs from day one, and we step back on a schedule you set. You keep 100% of the IP, we never take equity, and a mutual NDA is signed before any technical detail is shared.
What we are, and what we are not
- We are engineers who evaluate engineers, an engineering hiring consultant in the literal sense: we do not source candidates, keep a candidate database, charge placement fees or guarantee that anyone accepts an offer.
- We work alongside your recruiter, in-house or agency; if you have none and the role justifies one, we will say so.
- We give no advice on employment law, visas, equity grants or compensation benchmarks; your counsel and your HR lead own those.
What you receive from a technical hiring engagement
- A role brief: the real scope, what the role is not, the level the work needs, and the plan for everything it does not cover.
- A job description written by an engineer, naming the stack, the hardware stage and the first three deliverables.
- A screening rubric for portfolios and code, so the recruiter's first pass and ours agree.
- The interview loop: questions, review artifacts, debugging scenarios, the design conversation, and a take-home scoped to two to four hours.
- A written assessment of each finalist, with evidence against the rubric and a level recommendation.
- A 90-day plan for the hire.
- Optionally, engineering during the search as its own quoted project.
Where we do technical hiring work
We are based in Silicon Valley and work with startups across the United States, mostly remotely: interviews, reviews and take-home debriefs run on video, with hardware on a bench and a camera on it. How a remote engagement runs is on working with us from anywhere in the US, and our checklist on how to vet a hardware engineering firm applies just as well to the people who will vet your candidates.
How it starts and how it is priced
It starts with a free 30-minute call with a senior engineer: bring the posting you have, or the roadmap if there is none yet, and any candidates in flight. The first step is bounded: the role brief and hiring plan, quoted in writing before it starts, with the interview loop and the finalist assessments as the phases that follow. You can stop after any phase and keep everything produced so far.
Like every engagement here, the work is priced in engineering hours, and you get a written quote with phases before anything begins. The engineering bridge, if you want one, is quoted as a project of its own.
When you are ready, book the free 30-minute call. For a planning range on the engineering bridge, the free Project Cost Estimator gives you one in a couple of minutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does technical hiring help for startups include?
The technical side of a hire, end to end: an honest definition of the role, a job description written by an engineer, a screening rubric for portfolios and code, the technical interview loop and a short take-home, a written assessment of each finalist, a level recommendation and a 90-day plan. Sourcing and the offer process stay with your recruiter. If you need engineering done while the search runs, that is a separate project with its own written quote.
Are you a recruiter or a staffing agency?
No. We do not source candidates, keep a candidate database, charge placement fees or guarantee that anyone accepts. We are an engineering firm, and the people screening your candidates design boards, write firmware and ship software for a living. We work alongside your recruiter, in-house or agency, and own the technical judgement they cannot provide. If you have no recruiter and the role needs one, we will say so.
How do you evaluate a hardware engineer when we have no hardware team of our own?
By looking at work, not claims. We ask for a board the candidate designed end to end and talk through the schematic, the layout decisions, the revisions and what failed in testing; an engineer who owned the design answers in detail. A short schematic review with planted issues and a debugging scenario then show how they reason. You get a written assessment with the evidence, so you can decide without having to be a hardware engineer yourself.
Can you act as the technical interviewer on our panel?
Yes. We write the loop, run the technical sessions or sit in on yours, and debrief in writing after each one. Candidates are told they are talking to an outside engineer working with your team. The design conversation about your product runs under whatever candidate NDA you already use; our own mutual NDA with you is signed before we see any detail. The decision stays yours; our job is to make sure it is made on evidence.
Can you do the engineering until the hire starts?
Yes, as its own project with a written quote and phases. During the search we can carry the board revision, the firmware bring-up or the app release, and we plan the handover from the start: a documented design, a repository that builds, bring-up notes and a test plan. The new engineer inherits a working product rather than a mystery, and you keep 100% of the IP throughout.
Will you tell us what salary to offer?
No. We do not publish, quote or benchmark salary figures; your recruiter and your compensation data own that. What we calibrate is the level the work actually needs, in writing, with each finalist's evidence mapped against it. That is the part that tends to be wrong in a startup's first technical offer, and it is the part an engineer can judge. The number itself is a conversation between you and your recruiter.
Ready to talk specifics?
A 30-minute call with a senior engineer beats three rounds of email. Tell us what you're building.